The first look poster of actor Jayam Ravi‘s next film Bhoomi has dropped. The film helmed by director Lakshman is being bankrolled by Sujataa Vijaykumar’s Home Movie Makers which had previously commissioned director Karthik Thangavel’s Adanga Maru that also had Jayam Ravi in the lead. The actor will be seen associating with director Lakshman for the third time after successful outings in Romeo Julietand Bogan.
The first look features Jayam Ravi in a vest and turban with a bunch of similar yet older men. The actor is seen to adopt the mien of a farmer.
Happy to share the first look of my 25th film #Bhoomi 😇😇 This ones gonna be special! God bless! #BhoomiFirstLook#JR25
Nidhhi Agerwal will be seen with Jayam Ravi in the film, marking her debut in Kollywood. D Imman will be composing music, Chennai Express fame Dudley will be cranking the camera, John will edit and G Durairaj will helm art. Stunt Shiva will be choreographing action sequences with Brinda master choreographing dance. The rest of the cast is yet to be announced.
A source privy to the film told Silverscreen that the movie deals with agriculture and its collapsing stature owing to the corporate world. Reportedly, the film was originally titled Sarvaadhikaari but was later rechristened Bhoomi.
Here is the first look poster of Bhoomi.
Meanwhile, Jayam Ravi who was last seen in Pradeep Ranganathan’s Comali, will next feature in director Ahmed’s film alongside Taapsee Pannu. He is also reportedly a part of director Mani Ratnam’s Ponniyin Selvan which will go on floors in December. Nidhhi Agerwal was last seen in Puri Jagannadh’s iSmart Shankar.
One of the central characters in Arun Kumar Aravind’s Underworld is Padmanabhan (Mukesh), a former cabinet minister, now serving a prison sentence for a high-profile corruption case. In a pivotal scene set inside his prison cell, a book – MK Gandhi’s My Experiments With Truth – is placed in prominence. “I’ve always wanted to read this book. Now I have the perfect opportunity,” smiles the politician. Of course, the director and the writer mean to hint at the wickedness of the character. He is oddly calm inside the jail. He might have a great plan. However an hour and some odd minutes later when the film ends, the details of his wickedness remain undelivered. Perhaps there was no plan at all.
Every element in Underworld – the chest-thumping background score, slow-motion shots and other hackneyed aesthetic elements – does little else than rendering the narrative obvious. Instead of a personality, the characters get a hip sense of fashion that reeks of pretentiousness. They claim to be smarter than everyone around them, but end up making the stupidest decisions at pivotal moments. Instead of a sturdy backstory or convincing details to hold the film’s emotional narrative together, Aravind uses an overdose of slow-motion shots and punch dialogues that work like bullets fired into the air.
It is an irony that a film as shallow as this is named Underworld.
At one point in the film, you see a visual from Bharathan’s iconic Thazhvaram playing on television. It’s an unintentionally cheesy moment because you see the kind of revenge story Aravind is aiming for, but clearly he doesn’t have the material (or the will) to delve into that depth. Underworld is a cat and mouse chase between a lone sadist criminal, Solomon (Lal Jr) and two relatively lowly thugs, Stalin John (Asif Ali) and Majeed (Farhan Faasil). There are a couple of interesting set-pieces where the characters showcase their daredevilry and that they’re capable of serious violence. The problem is, none of those moments develop into a memorable sequence that leave the audience in awe. The writing isn’t barely smart, and Aravind’s directorial choices are misplaced.
For one, several times in the film’s initial half, Stalin announces to the camera that he is a self-made hero. A well-cut song sequence in the early part of the film quickly establishes that he, the son of a lower-middle-class widow (Sree Lakshmi) in a nondescript village, was drawn into the world of crimes at an early age. But the makers are less invested in delineating Stalin’s influences, circumstances or facets of his inner-personality that makes him an expert at what he does than they are in announcing to the world his special talent in dishing out punchy dialogues. “You don’t know who you are messing with,” he repeats to various people he meets. But there is no evident effort from the part of the film’s makers to help Stalin deserve those dialogues or the audience’s attention. The narrative isn’t really dynamic.
The only fleeting moment we get a sense of what is going on inside his head is when he makes an impulsive decision to explode a building in the centre of the village using LPG cylinders. The slow-mo shot with him in the foreground and the burning building in the background – a classic image – is promising. But it fizzles out as the film quickly moves on to more of exhaustingly ordinary instances, and end in a climactic showdown that is shockingly shoddy.
The early scenes of Majeed are about a love story that’s composed using the most cliched images. Aravind even uses an utterly forgettable song in this part that pushes Majeed further into the zone of mediocrity. Worse, Faasil is a lousy actor who does a bad job at making Majeed’s hotheadedness endearing. The editing of the film (Arun Kumar Aravind himself) turns the narrative thoroughly uneven and an ordeal to sit through. The only sensitive element in Underworld must be Alex J Pullikkal’s cinematography that maintains a consistency and a nice restrain.
Arunkumar Aravind’s best known films, Left Right Left and Ee Adutha Kaalathu, were interesting dramas that paid attention to the complexity of human nature. Underworld is an essentially different film that aspires to be ‘mass’ and stylish. However, Aravind ignores a basic fact here, that the primary quality expected of an entertainer is an ability to have its audience emotionally involved in its proceedings. Underworld doesn’t succeed even remotely in being a gripping film, let alone be a memorably stylish entertainer.
The Underworld review is a Silverscreen original article. It was not paid for or commissioned by anyone associated with the film. Silverscreen.in and its writers do not have any commercial relationship with movies that are reviewed on the site.
As actress Aishwarya Rai Bachchan turns 46 today we’re listening to songs in which the star unleashed her dancing prowess.
Hello Mister Ethirkatchi, Iruvar (1997)
The actress began her Kollywood career with this Mani Ratnam directorial. The song features a young Aishwarya shaking a leg as Mohanlal and Gautami look on. With that iconic green dress with tassles, in this charbuster, she shot to fame.
Poovukul Olinthirukum, Jeans (1998)
The song was shot at all the seven wonders of the world and had Aishwarya in themed outfits. Directed by Shankar, she was paired opposite actor Prashanth in the film.
Nimbooda Nimbooda, Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam (1999)
She dazzles in every frame here with her superb screen presence. I still wonder how her blue ghagra choli stayed put despite those heavy movements. Directed by Sanjay Leela Bhansali, she was paired opposite Salman Khan and Ajay Devgn in this film.
Crazy Kiya Re, Dhoom 2 (2006)
She sure was the sexy lady on the floor. Effortlessly pulling off the moves in this song. Her eyes do the talking in most parts of the song rendered by Sunidhi Chauhan. She is paired opposite Hrithik Roshan in this Sanjay Gadhvi directorial.
Nanare, Guru (2007)
This famous peppy number was on every playlist back then and the iconic dance step was recreated whenever it rained. Her elegance and happy-go-lucky attitude added something extra to the song rendered by Shreya Ghoshal in AR Rahman‘s music. Directed by Maniratnam, she was paired opposite her spouse Abhishek Bachchan.
Irumbile Oru Idhayam, Endhiran (2010)
The song entirely based on a robot and the emotions it goes through because of her, has the actress in a robotic outfit performing some classic moves. Directed by Shankar, the actress is paired opposite actor Rajinikanth in the film.
Some of my favourite things about Ondu Motteya Kathe (of which Ujda Chaman is an official remake) are how unlikable the protagonist is, and yet how endearing the film turns out to be; how it captures that small town-ness of Mangalore, how quiet it is, and how everyone’s personality comes through. How slowly yet steadily the plot progresses towards Janardhana’s acceptance of who he is, and in turn who Sarala is. His baldness overwhelms him, but it is not all he is, we are shown other aspects of his personality. He loves actor Raj Kumar, he really likes Kannada and corrects people when they are wrong. Hell, he even writes love letters in chaste Kannada, and there’s a superb set up in which, his pride wounded, he tells off a Tamil marriage broker that he, a Kannada man is capable of finding his own bride.
Abhishek Pathak has set his remake in Delhi and bafflingly rejected everything that made OMK work. None of the things I liked about the Kannada film make it to the remake. Instead, what we have is a loud, often boring film that evokes very little by way of emotion. I would have loved to hate the protagonist Chaman Kohli. Instead, I felt indifferent. Sunny’s face is devoid of any expression that can show what kind of angst Chaman’s gripped by. This coldness pervades through the script and the film. The background music tries to do all the work of the emoting, loudly, and it remains a major source of irritation.
Raj B Shetty was confronting an inner demon with OMK and it showed. Here, it is simply a parade of tedious scenes, as we wait for Chaman to show some semblance of being human. While Janardhana was painfully self-aware, Chaman is clueless and, just so… blah.
Chaman is 30, bald and is being rejected by all the women in the arranged marriage market when a swamiji predicts that he will remain celibate if he doesn’t marry soon. His family asks him to find himself someone. The movie is about his attempt at finding that someone who will see beyond the baldness. Unfortunately, the movie gives us so little to understand him. We are never shown who he is — apart from a Hindi lecturer in search of a woman. (He even dates a student in his desperation, but she’s after something else altogether.)
Maanvi Gaagroo who plays Apsara, his Tinder date is superb and is among the few people in the film who brings the screen alive. She seems earnest and real but we never see why she likes Chaman. That arc was way more convincing in Kannada. Here, it is just convenient. (Grusha Kapoor as Chaman’s mother is great and shines in her small role, but there’s only so much the two women can do to prop up this film written without any feeling.)
There’s a Shakespeare-sque misunderstanding and Apsara and Chaman who think of parting ways as friends because neither likes the way the other looks, end up being almost engaged. Until Chaman finally musters the courage (if we can call a whatsapp message that) calls it off on the day of the engagement. At which point, I was already exhausted, because I knew he had to now feel bad, have a change of heart, learn his lesson, and have a happy ending.
All of this he goes through, with a poker face. Without any sense of anguish spilling over to his life or face. Nothing is ever at stake in Ujda Chaman.
The Ujda Chaman review is a Silverscreen original article. It was not paid for or commissioned by anyone associated with the film. Silverscreen.in and its writers do not have any commercial relationship with movies that are reviewed on the site.
Recently, speculations were rife that Atlee will direct Shah Rukh Khan after his Vijay–Nayanthara starrer Bigil that recently hit the screens. The latest buzz is that the film is reportedly titled Sanki and will be a commercial film that will cater to all audiences.
i have a huge amount of love and respect for #SRK sir and he also loves my work. Soon, hopefully, we will do something about it.#AskAtleehttps://t.co/3pPL2sXcAz
“The makers of Shah Rukh Khan and Atlee’s next are very keen to name the film Sanki. Shah Rukh will be seen playing the role of a hotheaded hero and that’s why the title. The team might announce the same on the occasion of Shah Rukh’s birthday,” according to a report in Koi Moi.
“More than writer-director, I’m waiting for this as a fan. The news is coming out, I don’t know how immediately this will happen. Atlee sir is going to direct King Khan, SRK. Being a huge fan of SRK, I’m waiting for this combo so that I can also come to that function and see SRK. I’m a huge fan of King Khan,” said Telugu writer-director Harish Shankar recently.
What’s interesting is that Shah Rukh Khan had taken to Twitter to promote Bigil’s trailer, when it dropped. Perhaps indicating his newfound association with the director.
Kollywood has, over the years, made fantastic new attempts in genre cinema, be it crime-thrillers, rom-coms, action-drama or fantasy. Despite some questionable failures, the industry has managed to churn out good horror films too, that have succeeded in spooking out as well as entertaining audiences. Here are some films that made it to my list of personal favourites. Boo!
Eeram, 2009
One of the earliest horror movies I watched and loved was this Aadhi Pinisetty and Sindhu Menon starrer directed by Arivazhagan Venkatachalam. The film comprised all the elements of a good story — love, betrayal, revenge. The supernatural element was unique yet logical. Actor Nandha‘s performance and the song ‘Vizhiye Vizhiye’ composed by Thaman stood out. The film is streaming on Youtube.
Pizza, 2012
This movie brought instant recognition for director Karthik Subbaraj for its exceptional screenplay and gripping narrative. The thriller blew my mind away and of course, left me craving for pizza. Vijay Sethupathi as Michael the pizza delivery boy single-handedly moves the story forward. Gopi Amarnath‘s cinematography and Santhosh Narayanan‘s background score (which still rings in my head) added immense value to the simple plot inside a house. ‘Moga Thirai’ is a song I enjoy even when I hear it today. The film does have a sequel, Pizza II: Villa, but the first part stays my number one. Pizza is streaming on Hotstar.
Pisaasu, 2014
One of director Myskkin‘s most underrated films, that takes a completely different path whilst staying within the contours of the horror genre. There’s love, humour, violence, and a wonderful twist in the narrative towards the climax. Our attention is held throughout the film without any ‘commercial’ elements woven into the plot. When I made the connection (much later, thanks to a friend) about the film being based on the famous fairytale ‘Cinderella’ my mind went kaboom! The film is streaming on Hotstar.
Kanchana (Muni 2), 2015
This is an example of a sensitive script dealt exceptionally well by its actors. At a time when the LGBTQ+ community was secluded and demeaned for their countenance, two actors, Raghava Lawrence and R Sarathkumar decided to lend on-screen dignity to their portrayal. The red saree adorned by the characters is an iconic image now, one that has been etched in the minds of audiences. The film is currently being remade in Hindi as Laxxmi Bomb, starring Akshay Kumar. The film also has two sequels which I would like to, well, ignore. Kanchana is streaming on Sun Nxt.
Aval (2017)
With Aval I finally witnessed a film that truly gave me the thrills and spills required for the genre, after the gap of a few years in Tamil cinema. The film is based on the true story of a Chinese couple who lived near the mountains with their daughter. Filled with gruesome imagery and disturbing visuals, the film is bound to haunt you for a while. Actors Siddharth and Andrea Jeremiah perform effortlessly along with Anisha Angelina Victor (Jenny in the film). The VFX and sound design take the film a notch higher. The melody ‘Kaarigai Kanne’ which takes us down the memory lane of the lead pair has stunning visuals accompanied by the voices of Vijay Prakash and Shakthisree Gopalan. The film is streaming on Netflix.
If you’re in the mood for some light-hearted horror, don’t worry we’ve got you covered. Here’s my pick from the several horror-comedy films made in Kollywood.
Devi(L), 2016
This Prabhu Deva–Tamannaah starrer helmed by AL Vijay finds a spirit striking a deal with the protagonist for a particular want that it couldn’t fulfill. The film takes an interesting turn at the very beginning and progresses seamlessly after that. I think Tamannaah proved her acting prowess with this film that has a strong emotional arc running throughout. Devi(L) is streaming on Sony Liv.
Sangili Bungili Kadhava Thorae, 2017
This is a horror-comedy that addresses the importance of family and bonds. The movie adopts adult-comedy in its narrative but does not overplay it. The entire cast including Jiiva, Sri Divya, and Soori perform well along with Radhika Sarathkumar, Radha Ravi and Thambi Ramiah. Ike, former assistant of Kamal Haasan has helmed the movie. The film is streaming on Hotstar.
Petromax, 2019
Headlined by Tamannaah who doesn’t occupy too much screen space, this is a film that deals with family yet again. You are shown the perspective of the spirit and you end up empathising with them. The main reason for the film making it to my list? The brilliant performances of Munishkanth, Sathyan, Kaali Venkat and TSK. There is never a dull moment when they are on screen, and the jokes work most of the time. The film does not ‘comprise’ with songs or any of the other commercial element that horror movies usually adopt. It is a remake of the Telugu film Anando Brahma and is still running in theatres.
It’s been a little more than two years since the Kannada superhit Ondu Motteya Kathe released, and the juggernaut continues to roll on in Hindi with the official remake Ujda Chaman, releasing tomorrow (November 1.) The Malayalam version Thamaasha released in July this year. There’s also Ayushmann Khurrana-starrer Bala, slated to release on November 7; it also deals with the travails of someone fast losing his hair.
What set Ondu Motteya Kathe (streaming on Netflix) apart, both in 2017 and now (based on the Malayalam film and the Hindi trailer) is the innocence with which the story was narrated. And so, Silverscreen spoke to writer-director Raj B Shetty, who also played the iconic Janardhan in the original, to speak about the process of making a film that could ridicule in the way it spoke about a topic, but chose not to.
What stood out most about OMK was how Raj created a protagonist steeped in body-image issues and self-doubt, but who was not above judging others based on how they looked. Janardhan was real, never saintly. “He was the most negative person in the story,” laughs Raj. “You used the word relatable. That’s right, I kept him regular so that everyone could relate to him. Every film is a possibility in self-exploration and I always feel I learn something because of my characters and story. The human mind thinks this way: ‘I don’t have this aspect of beauty and am inferior, so I should compensate by dating or marrying a beautiful girl.’ I did not decide to make Janardhan that way, probably it was an attempt to address what I was facing through a character who has lesser confidence and friends than me, and a little more ego. I wanted to see how he faces ridicule; it was an interesting idea to explore.”
The film also celebrated the fact that love is not necessarily about grand gestures, the over-the-top declarations. “We are all ordinary, regular people. I have friends who are simple, but great because of what they do. The peon Srinivas’ character was inspired by my friend who would call his wife every hour, even eight years after their wedding. If he did not call, she would. They’d just say hello, talk things others might consider inane, but they spoke. I wondered how he could do that. Was it mechanical? But then I realised that that is also love, and it was missing in many of us. We look for the great gestures, we read literature, watch classics, wait for that one big moment, and let go of the small, cute habits that are doable.”
For Raj, writing OMK was also deeply therapeutic. “That’s the most beautiful thing about art. When you befriend your inner demons, you’re not fighting them anymore, they go way. That’s what happened to me with this film.”
The film made the audience laugh at the situation, never at a person. “When the trailer released, there were comments on YouTube from those who were bald or balding that the film might be a painful experience for them. After the film, they adopted it as their own, as one film that spoke for them, about them. I believe that the way you speak or crack jokes speaks about the kind of human you are. If you’re laughing at someone’s misery, you’re not human anymore. And no, I did not write it that way, because I am bald too, but because it was the right thing to do.”
One of the laugh-aloud moments is when Janardhan reads out a letter he has written in poetic Kannada to a lady he’s crushing on, in the lyrical Mangaluru dialect. “It was all about his innocence. He lives in another world….”
And it is precisely for that another-world feeling that Raj set the film in Mangaluru, where the ebb and flow of life is calm and far removed from the cackle of metropolitan cities. If films are a geographical indicator, OMK scored high on that front.
“The quality of the local culture and people rubs off on Janardhan too. Filmmakers should set films in places they know well, and not in places where they can assume things. In Mangaluru, the Kannada spoken is really soft, the tone is different. There’s a slowness to life that adds to Janardhan’s loneliness. He looks less confident because of the way he speaks. Imagine someone like him speaking in Bengaluru Kannada? Also, in a small town, everyone has a space of their own; the city is not in a hurry. In a bigger city, the character would change in two-three years to become like everyone else. Here, one can stay ensconced in a cocoon. And, Janardhan lives in one such cocoon,” elaborates Raj.
This is also why he said no to the offer to remake and act and direct the film in Telugu. “I’m done with Janardhan. My self-exploration is over. When it is remade in other languages, it will take on that local flavour. {Ujda has a distinct Punjabi flavour; Thamaasha is set in Malappuram, but the language in the film was predominantly textbook Malayalam; it also used the setting of the Bharathhappuzha river well}. For me, the core of OMK is a beautiful study material, about how one can sensitively deal with a topic and not ridicule it.”
The sitcom Fresh Off The Boat will host Vir Das and Preity Zinta as guest stars in its next episode. The show talks about the life of a Taiwanese-American family in Florida in the 1990s will soon have a spin-off, tentatively titled Magic Motor Inn reportedly starring the two actors. The idea for a spin-off series has been on the works a while.
Fresh Off The Boat, which is currently in its sixth season, stars Randall Park (Louis Huang, the husband), Constance Wu (Jessica Huang, the wife), Hudson Yang (Edwyn/Eddie Huang, oldest son), Forrest Wheeler (Emery Huang, middle son), Ian Chen (Evan Huang, youngest son), and Lucille Soong (Jenny Huang, the grandmother). The upcoming episode, which will reportedly be filmed next month, centres around an Indian family whose daughter attends school with Eddie, according to Deadline.
Vir Das (DC) and Preity Zinta (Meena) will portray the girl’s parents. The character introduction of the two will reportedly serve as the basis for the spin-off series, to be written by Rachna Fruchbom who has written several episodes for Fresh Off The Boat.
Variety reported, “An individual with knowledge of the situation says that this episode is not a backdoor pilot, however. If ABC should decide to further develop the spin-off, it would need to shoot a pilot during the traditional pilot season.”
Magic Motor Inn will be bankrolled by 20th Century Fox.
Watch the trailer of Fresh Off The Boat here. The show is streaming on the OTT platform, Hotstar in India.
Preity Zinta was last seen in the 2018 action-comedy Bhaiaji Superhit, which saw her play the lead role after five years. The actor is currently one of the owners of the T20 IPL team, Kings XI Punjab. Vir Das who is currently touring the world for his new stand-up comedy show, The Loved Tour, is part of actor-director Kamal Haasan‘s Sabaash Naidu a.k.a Shabhash Kundu which has been delayed. The actor’s travel comedy show Jestination Unknown is also streaming now on Amazon Prime.
One of the most intricate and fascinating horror-dramas in India was made in Malayalam cinema. Fazil-Madhu Muttom duo’s Manichithrathazhu (1993) made fantastic use of the tropes of horror and psychological genres. The film was remade in different Indian languages including Tamil and Hindi, and has garnered a cult following over the years. The history of horror genre in Malayalam cinema dates back to the black and white era, when Vincent adapted writer Vaikom Mohammad Basheer’s Bhargavinilayam (1964) featuring Madhu, Prem Nazir and Vijaya Nirmala in the lead roles. The film narrates the tale of a house haunted by the spirit of a wronged woman – a plot trope that never gets old.
In 1978, director AG Baby made Lisa, the first of the long list of horror entertainers he made until 1991. Interestingly, the techniques and motifs that he employed in his film such as semi-erotic song sequences, monster faces, black cats and barking dogs continue to be used by commercial filmmakers till today. If horror is one of the most under-explored genres in Malayalam cinema, it’s because the local horror film makers have rarely dared to move out of the camp Baby created in the 80s that resembles the one that Ramsay Brothers made in Hindi.
Here is a list of some of the most (unintentionally) entertaining B-grade horror films in Malayalam that features kitschy production design, bad acting and the most bizarre plot points.
Dracula 3D (2012)
This film, directed by Vinayan, easily tops the list. A newly-wed couple from Kerala travels to Romania to spend their honeymoon exploring the Transylvanian castle. The good husband leaves his wife in hotel room and goes to perform witchcraft – which is apparently his passion – in an abandoned bungalow. Big mistake. Dracula 3D isn’t just the first Malayalam horror film in 3D, but it might also be the first film to feature the Count Dracula as a hairy monster who does desi stunts.
To director Vinayan’s credit, he made this film at a time he was ostracised by the trade unions in Malayalam film industry. In Dracula as well as his previous film, Yakshiyum Njanum, Vinayan employs the hit tropes and techniques that he used in Aakashaganga (1999), a horror film that inarguably made his career – there are totally unreasonable scenes involving young women in bathrobes, comedians with abysmal sense of humour, and convoluted plot points.
Here, it is not just the tacky and shabby production design and poor directorial choices that causes the damage. The cast, largely made up of new actors, deliver outrageously bad performances which is further ruined by terrible dubbing.
When the husband goes missing, the wife panics, but she doesn’t seem as panicky as she should be when the missing man appears out of the blue inside her washroom while she is taking a bath.
The budget and production constraints didn’t dissuade Vinayan from filming an item song where Dracula dances with scantily-clad Indian and European belly dancers on a stage where a roasted pig head platter is placed at the centre.
Vinayan’s Dracula moves to Kerala and settles down in a traditional mansion. He is eventually gets reined in by Nasser who plays a Malayali sorcerer, and Prabhu who plays a ghost hunter who hypnotises Dracula’s lover to obtain details such as “My Lord is crossing a railway track now.”
Summer Palace (2000)
Yet another story of the spirit of a wronged woman possessing a living person to avenge her death, Summer Palace, directed by K Murali, stands out for being one of the few horror films in which the ghost possesses a man. Krishna Kumar, who plays a married man who moves into the haunted summer palace with his wife, gets possessed by a demonic power.
The film has bizarre characters like a sex-crazed tribal man who looks like he walked straight out of Apocalypse, a pulp-fiction novelist who doubles as the film’s comedian who runs a parallel meaningless plot track, a rustic servant boy who gets a metrosexual make-over in an out-of-the-blue romantic duet, and a Yakshi who easily gets to her preys although she makes no effort to hide her identity. In a hilarious scene, Kumar’s friend accidentally cuts her finger while slicing a mango, and his fangs come out.
Megha Sandesham(2001)
Director Rajasenan introduced to the world a Yakshi with incredible digestive powers and a rebellious sense of fashion. She befriends her former crush (Suresh Gopi), moves into his sprawling bungalow, joins him for a breakfast of idli, dresses up in colourful clothes and impresses him with her singing skills. Things go smooth until his girlfriend and family arrive, and the wedding preparations go off.
Soudamini (2003)
This film features one of the kitschiest scenes in the history of Malayalam horror cinema. Sankaran (Jagadeesh), a happy-go-lucky man, while cycling back home from work at night, comes across a little girl on a deserted road. The child refuses to answer any of his questions, but he offers her a lift anyway. He even sings a song to cheer her up.
And then the horror happens. The child turns into a full-grown adult, though, the man doesn’t realise her presence on his pillion seat for a suspiciously long time.
The Yakshi refuses to leave him in spite of his pleadings, and then he seeks the help of the local police who keeps the Yakshi in custody. The next morning they find a skeleton in her place. The film, directed by P Gopikumar, features some very popular character artistes in Malayalam cinema.
I have mixed feelings about the upcoming Little Women movie.
Sure it has a great cast and a director who loves the book, but it will never be the same. Like many bookish, nerdy 90s kids, I believed that the books were always, always better than the movies. I grumbled that the Lord of the Rings movies weren’t faithful to the books and I clean refused to watch the last few Harry Potter movies. The movies, long as they were, could never get all the words in the books – I mean, Matilda and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory weren’t even funny. Nor could they capture all the elaborate fan fiction I was writing, with its “Strong Female Characters” and exciting plot twists. Little Women was one of my favourite books growing up. Meg, Jo, Beth and, Amy were young women navigating the world together. Jo, especially, was everything I wanted to be when I grew up – funny, confident and a writer. Would Little Women ever be as perfect on screen?
Now, as I’ve got older, I had to admit that not all movies were the unimaginative, budget-constrained, lowest-common-denominator-appealing entertainment my snobbish teenage self had thought them to be. The Godfather is a bloody brilliant movie. I even had to admit that The Devil Wears Prada and Bridget Jones’ Diary, were a teeny bit better than the books – no one, no one in my fanfiction was as deliciously evil as Meryl Streep’s Miranda Priestly, or as self-consciously silly as Renée Zellweger’s Bridget. And frankly, The Devotion of Suspect X wasn’t even close to Drishyam in entertainment value. But these are short books. Surely, it isn’t possible to put a long-form novel on screen and still tell a great story?
Or is it?
In my 90s home, cable television was called the idiot box. All you could watch were mega-serials with flimsy plots and very dressed up women, dubiously dubbed cartoons on Cartoon Network and Friends if your parents didn’t catch you watching. But unbeknownst to me in my pre-broadband world, television was changing. The Sopranos was first, letting the story of a mafia don unfold on screen like a novel. Not long after, David Simon took his experiences as a crime reporter in Baltimore (and the book Homicide, no less!), and turned them into The Wire.
TV wasn’t mindless anymore. It was a means to tell a story, at leisure, with the kind of attention to detail you would expect in any great novel. The actors could really act, and the stories were raw and real. I found myself gripped as the stories of Tony Soprano and Stringer Bell unfolded before me, the emotional roller coaster no different from the finest novels. Even the sitcoms were changing – shows like Brooklyn Nine-Nine went far beyond the tired comedy tropes of Friends and Seinfeld, to make truly wonderful jokes.
And so it was that I, a book snob if there ever was one, found myself watching glued to the screen, and admitting that some of those shows were…well, they were majestic, spectacular works of art. Take Wolf Hall, Mark Rylance’s adaptation of Hilary Mantel’s novels on Thomas Cromwell, which captures the sombre, dark mood of the times and the inside of Cromwell’s head. Or consider Sharp Objects, which took Gillian Flynn’s eponymous novel, added some chilling performances by Amy Adams and Patricia Clarkson and turned it into a fantastically terrifying watch. Or Sherlock and Elementary, which located fiction’s most beloved Victorian detective in the present day, showing that no one ever really tires of great detective stories. I found myself reluctantly admitting that I really looked forward to the adaptation of Good Omens; and really enjoying every second of the show.
Television isn’t perfect – not even David Tennant and some clever use of Queen songs can be as good as Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman’s writing – but it’s a pretty awesome way to tell stories. You can devour television, binge-watching all weekend as you would any unputdownable page-turner, or you can savour it, stretch it out, watch a tiny bit every day as the finale inches ever closer. Movies require an investment, a trip to the cinema, three hours of your time, popcorn of questionable quality. Television is more forgiving – always there for you at home, on your own couch, just like an old friend or a great book.
Which brings me back to Little Women. Sure, I will watch it – I mean, who wouldn’t watch Meryl Streep play Aunt March – but two hours of Meryl Streep will never be as good as the book. A TV show though? I would wait with bated breath for it.
Anupama is a policy researcher who still wants to be a writer when she grows up. She claims to tweet at @dishonblequote, but mostly just follows cute animals.
Two of the most talented actors in Malayalam cinema, Suraj Venjarammood and Soubin Shahir, reunite in Ratheesh Balakrishnan Poduval’s Android Kunjappan Version 5.25, an oddball comedy which features a robot in one of the central roles.
The trailer of the film, amusingly cut to the tick of a clock, hints that the film narrates the tale of a curious family of a father and his two grownup sons, Suraj Venjarammood, Soubin Shahir and Saiju Kurup respectively, in an old rural Kerala house. The sons’ defiance against the father’s stubborn old-fashioned ways, and the arrival of a Japanese-made robot to the household seems to be the crux of the film. The highlight of the trailer is the chemistry between Suraj and Soubin who were recently seen together in Vikruthi.
Android Kunjappan 5.25 is written and directed by Ratheesh, an acclaimed production designer who has worked in films such as Kammattipadam. The film, which was extensively shot in Russia and Kerala, is produced by Santhosh T Kuruvila. Sanu John Varughese is the cinematographer, and Saiju Sreedharan is the editor. The film’s music is composed by Bijibal. The film is set to release in theatres in November.
Director-Producer Sanjay Leela Bhansali had recently announced the title of his next film starring Alia Bhatt in the lead role. The magnum opus film titled Gangubai Kathiawadi is reportedly the biopic of a sex worker, who later emerged as an underworld don in Mumbai. The latest is that the director has also announced his next after Gangubai Kathiawadi. The film titled Baiju Bawra is the revenge story of a maverick maestro named ‘Tansen’. The cast of the film is yet to be announced.
Bhansali Productions took to Twitter to announce the news.
Gangubai Kathiawadi has reportedly roped in Ajay Devgn to play the male lead. The official announcement is yet to be made. If confirmed, the film will mark the second association of actor Ajay Devgn with Sanjay Leela Bhansali, who earlier worked on Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam. Alia Bhatt and Ajay Devgn have also worked on director SS Rajamouli‘s upcoming action-period film RRR.
“Ajay Devgn and Sanjay Leela Bhansali met at Anand Pandit’s Diwali party last week and chatted for hours. They caught up on a lot of stuff and that’s when Sanjay Leela Bhansali invited him over to his office. Ajay dropped in a couple of days after that and they had a meeting for more than a couple of hours. Sanjay Leela Bhansali offered him two scripts — a biopic and a fictional love story, which is said to be Baiju Bawra. In Baiju Bawra, the actor was offered the role of ‘Tansen’. Ajay liked his role in Gangubai Kathiawadi as it’s an intense character — a mobster with a golden heart, who teaches Gangubai the tricks of the trade and falls in love with her,” stated a source as reported by Bollywood Hungama. The source also reportedly said, “The filmmaker also offered him another action-drama film based on a warrior, which will be directed later.”
Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Bhansali Productions and Jayantilal Gada’s Pen Movies will be bankrolling Gangubai Kathiawadi while Baiju Bawra is bankrolled solely by Bhansali Productions.
Gangubai Kathiawadi is slated for release on 11 September 2020 while Baiju Bawra is set for a Diwali 2021 release.
Meanwhile, Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s previous outing Malaal as a producer did not fare well at the box office. It was the official remake of the Tamil film 7G Rainbow Colony (starring Ravi Krishna and Sonia Agarwal, helmed by director Selvaraghavan.)
Set in the district of Baghpat, Chandro (Bhumi) and Prakashi (Taapsee) marry into a backward and conservative family of three brothers. The math and aftermath are simple. The wives of these brothers have a funnily regressive understanding of picking the colour of their dupatta. The eldest wears red and doesn’t speak a word for the most part of the movie (it was pretty easy to predict that in all likelihood, this woman would ‘explode’ during the climax). The second one – Chandro wears a blue dupatta and Prakashi is forced to pick yellow as red and blue are already taken. Chandro inducts the new bride Prakashi by giving her a low down on the don’ts of the family. Their husbands identify them by the colour of their dupattas and not by their faces. The three couples have a mutual understanding that the only room in the house on the terrace will be used for lovemaking twice a week. Sunday’s occupancy would depend on the sexual appetite of the men, so the one with the most uncontrollable urge would get a third chance.
The women strictly stay behind the veil, make cakes out of cow dung, bear countless children without using contraceptives, clean and cook around the house, and satisfy the sexual appetite of their respective husbands.
Rattan Singh (Prakash Jha), the eldest of the three brothers is the sarpanch of the village who believes that the women and girls of the house must remain within the four walls. Filmmaker Praskash Jha is so convincing in this role as the anti-hero, that he’s almost unbelievable towards the end when things fall into place. If you’ve watched the episode of Aamir Khan’s Satyameva Jayate that features the real-life Chandro and Prakashi Tomar who are better known as Shooter Dadis, you’ll know the central plot of Saand Ki Aankh.
A family where guns are labelled as ‘Mardon ke haath ka gehna’, Chandro and Prakashi develop exceptional finesse in sharpshooting in a nearby shooting range run by Doctor Yashpal (Vineet Singh) who spots their talent and decides to nurture it. The two women hit the bulls-eye every time they hold the gun and Yashpal tells them that bulls-eye in Hindi means “Saand Ki Aankh”. As the two successfully manage to keep this a secret from the men of the house by practicing in the wee hours, they decide to support the careers of their granddaughter Shefali and daughter Seema. They train them in shooting so that the girls get a government job under sports quota and do not have to lead a life like them again.
The director takes the entire first half to set the plot straight. Bhumi and Taapsee who have been at the centre of criticism for being miscast as 60-year-old women, actually do a commendable job. Both ladies are very effective in most parts of the film. Their dialogues, punches, and humour are on point. Bhumi deserves extra points for a more believable portrayal. The two women try their best to hold the movie, despite a faulty screenplay and predictable direction.
Editor Devendra Murfeshwar should have kept the movie an hour shorter. The build up takes so long that at made one want to exit the theatre in the first half. But, if you manage to survive past the interval, you’ll realise that the second half has more meat.
The writing is weak, which is reflected in the performances of the actors because they don’t have much to do in many scenes. The narrative isn’t logical: one moment the dadis don’t understand English, the next, Chandro’s speaking in English and knows how to hold a glass of champagne. (The two dadis are suddenly in the palace of the Maharani of Alwar and drinking champagne, followed by a four course meal.) There are moments in the film that try to establish tolerance and acceptance towards change. During this gala dinner hosted by the Maharani for the shooter dadis, both end up drinking the lemon water from the finger bowl, leaving the rest of the guests in an awkward silence. Contrary to what a queen would do, Maharani smiles and follows suit to make them feel comfortable.
Unfortunately, the Tomar men are the opposite and do not want to change. The characters except the two women don’t have any arcs.
The women are not miscast, the rest of the cast is. Chandro and Prakashi are perfect in what they’re supposed to deliver on screen, but there’s no connection between them and their husbands. Some scenes are so claustrophobic due to extras that you don’t quite know where to look. The idea of winning big at the shooting games and getting a government job, women empowerment and breaking stereotypes are some of the many messages that get lost in translation on celluloid. Both the dadis win until they finally lose, only to succumb to the atrocities of Rattan Singh. The fate of the narrator — Shefali (their grand daughter) goes up in smoke and doesn’t quite reach its destination. Rattan Singh’s wife, the woman behind the red veil finally does speak up for a minute’s screen time and nails it more than other side kicks.
The fear, the brutality of patriarchy and the terror among women in small towns are well crafted in Saand Ki Aankh, but the director doesn’t hit the bulls-eye.
I watched it in a theatre on a Tuesday afternoon with 50% occupancy, most of which were old aged people or families who had brought grandparents along. Some of them were sobbing, some clapped, and I kept looking at my watch.
The Saand ki Aankh review is a Silverscreen original article. It was not paid for or commissioned by anyone associated with the film. Silverscreen.in and its writers do not have any commercial relationship with movies that are reviewed on the site.
Actress Raadhika Sarathkumar who was last seen in Mr Localessaying actor Sivakarthikeyan‘s mother will now be hosting Kodeeswari, an all-women game show on Colors Tamil. The show is based on the famous ‘Who Wants To Be A Millionaire’ only with the exception that this will see only women on the ‘Hot Seat’. It is noteworthy that her spouse Sarathkumar was the host of a similar show Kodeeswaran which aired on Sun TV on weekends, a few years back.
The Tamil version of Who Wants To Be A Millionaire, Neengalum Vellalaam Oru Kodi, which aired on Vijay TV for three seasons saw three men hosting the show – actors Suriya Sivakumar, Prakash Raj, and Aravind Swami respectively. The show has now adopted a new format and will air on Colors TV with a woman hosting it for the first time.
கலர்ஸ் தமிழ் பெருமையுடன் வழங்கும் உலகத்தின் மிகப்பெரிய வண்ணமயமான கேம் ஷோ..!!
“Women are an important part of human society, acting as the binding force. Amidst the cacophony to empower women, that has become a cliché across geographies and communities, I think, the need to simply acknowledge her for who she is and what she stands for has been lost. Kodeeswari shall be a platform where every contestant on the ‘Hot Seat’ shall be celebrated for who she is and her journey amidst all her personal challenges,” said actress Raadhika Sarathkumar.
Anup Chandrasekharan, Business Head at Colors Tamil said, “Shows like Enga Veetu Mapillai, Dance Vs. Dance, Singing Stars in the non-fiction space have generated tremendous buzz for the channel and we hope to maintain the same with our latest endeavour, Kodeeswari. We thank Radikaa for joining hands with us in this incredible journey.”
The selection process for the contestants began yesterday (October 28) and ends on November 2. Those who want to participate have to answer a question by SMS or Interactive Voice Response Service (IVRS) or by logging in to the Voot App.
Actor Abhay Deol who was last seen in the Netflix comedy-drama film Chopsticks alongside Mithila Palkar will next be featuring in Line Of Descent (earlier titled The Field) which is set to release in the US on 13 December, by Gravitas Ventures. The film will also be screened at the New York City South Asian Film Festival (NYC SAFF) as the opening film of the festival. It will not be hitting the Indian screens but would instead premiere exclusively on Zee5, (date not announced yet).
He will be seen alongside Brendan Fraser, Ronit Roy, Neeraj Kabi, Prem Chopra, and Vineet Kumar Singh in the Rohit Karn Batra directorial. Line of Descent is being bankrolled by Guy Jon Louthan, his second Indian production after Roland Joffe’s The Lovers a.ka Time Traveller (earlier, Singularity) which was filmed in India in 2013. Incidentally, Abhay Deol had also debuted in Hollywood with the film.
Abhay Deol took to Instagram to announce the news. The actor said he was happy to work with veteran actor Prem Chopra. “My grandmother used to say of Mr. Chopra, ‘he’s a villain in reel life but such a gentleman in real life’. And today I am in the same film as him. This one’s for my granny”.
Director Rohit Karn Batra told Indie Wire, “The more the script evolved, the more obvious it became Brendan was the best choice for the idiosyncratic role of Charu. For a director to explore this journey with him in a place like India is nothing less than a once in a lifetime opportunity.”
The movie set in Delhi revolves around an Indian mafia family at war with itself following the death of the patriarch. It has been filmed in both English and Hindi.
Watch the trailer here.
Meanwhile, Abhay Deol will also be seen as the antagonist in the Tamil film Hero starring Sivakarthikeyan and Kalyani Priyadarshan. Helmed by Irumbuthirai fame PS Mithran, the film is produced by KJR Studios’ Kotapadi J Rajesh. The film’s teaser dropped recently and garnered over four-and-a-half million views. The film is all set for release on 20 December 2019.
The trailer of Action starring Vishal and Tamannaah has just dropped. The action-drama is helmed by actor-director Sundar C and bankrolled by R Ravindran under his Trident Arts banner. Vishal and Tamannaah will be working together once again after Suraj‘s 2016 action-comedy Kaththi Sandai. Action also marks the third association of Sundar C and Vishal after Aambala (2015) and the long-delayed Madha Gaja Raja.
The trailer begins with a few cars and men chasing Vishal, who we come to know of is Colonel Subash. The rest of the trailer is also the same only with the addition of massive glass breaking shots, stale dialogues, car crashes and something on the lines of revenge. Yogi Babu, Chaya Singh, Master Ashwanth, Ramki and Akanksha Puri also feature at different points. Tamannaah is seen accompanying Vishal for the action sequences with Aishwarya Lekshmi essaying the second female lead. The trailer ends with a reference to the actor’s film Irumbuthirai which dealt with cybercrime.
Action has Aishwarya Lekshmi, Yogibabu, Akanksha Puri, Kabir Duhan Singh, and Ramki playing significant roles apart from the lead pair. Music has been composed by Hiphop Tamizha with Dudley Raj’s cinematography and N.B. Srikanth‘s editing.
The action-drama is slated for a November release.
Watch the trailer here.
Recently, the first track from the film, ‘Nee Sirichalum’ dropped. Sadhana Sargam has rendered the song penned by Pa Vijay with music by Hiphop Tamizha.
Meanwhile, Vishal who was last seen in director Venkat Mohan’s Ayogya(remake of the Telugu movie Temper) alongside Raashi Khanna is currently busy with the pre-production of director Myskkin‘s Thupparivaalan 2. The team will be flying to London for the first schedule of the film, revealed a source. Tamannaah, whose last outing was Petromax (remake of the Telugu movie Anando Brahma) will next be seen in the Hindi film Bole Chudiyan alongside Nawazuddin Siddiqui, helmed by Shamas Nawab Siddiqui, Telugu film That is Mahalakshmi by Prasanth Varma (remake of Hindi movie Queen) and Anil Ravipudi’s Sarileru Neekevvaru for a dance number with Mahesh Babu.
This piece has been a little more than a year in the making. The first trigger was seeing the trailer of 96 in 2018, and sensing that something magical was going to unfold on screen soon. I spoke to directors, distributors, and others associated with the industry to see if they felt the same. Most did. But, it all began with Prem Kumar, who gave Trisha a fresh lease of life as Janu. The character, look, that yellow kurta, Chinmayi’s dubbing, Trisha’s chemistry with Vijay Sethupathi, the music, and the angst of love lost put Trisha firmly back in the place she belonged — as Tamil cinema’s sweetheart. You’ve had women being accorded superstar status, but what Trisha has achieved is rare: to stay relevant after 17 years in the industry is rare.
***
Sometime in 2005, when Prem Kumar was in his early 20s, he saw Trisha in the ‘Paakadha Enna Paakadha’ song from Hari’s Aaru. In a star vehicle high on action, Prem’s attention was drawn to something else – Trisha’s fleeting expressions. The actress was just a couple of years in the industry, but already had quite a few hit numbers and big-budget films to her credit, and was known to emote very well in songs. Years later, when he was turning director with 96, Prem remembered that. He was on the lookout for an actress to play Janu, the kind of girl who would not frown. “You really need to focus to catch those looks unique to her, and look beyond her amazing screen presence,” he says.
The audience saw more of that famed screen presence in Kireedam, Vinnaithaandi Varuvaaya, and other mainstream films, but then, it seemed there was a lull in the momentum. Trisha had ruled commercial cinema for long and stepped back to experiment with genres. She did horror, horror-comedy, turned antagonist… the works, but was yet to reclaim the top spot. While Trisha continued to be part of potential blockbusters, there was really no film that headlined her or banked on her experience as a tried and tested mainstream heroine. Barring her negative turn in Kodi or the much-loved Hemanika in Ennai Arindhaal, Trisha was making choices that were strictly average.
Still surprises
At a time when her contemporary Nayanthara had moved on to working with the next generation of young superstars, it looked like Trisha had been left behind. This, despite choosing heroine-driven projects such as Nayaki and Mohini that eventually did not do much for her career. It needed a 96 to get her to wow her audience the way she once used to.
“Is it not our fault that no one really tried to get her out of her comfort zone? After all, she is capable of a subtle, mature performance even within the commercial format,” explains Prem.
That argument makes sense. Because, unlike her contemporaries such as Asin and Nayanthara, and later Samantha and Keerthy Suresh, Trisha has been a part of too many blockbusters for directors to look beyond her commercial star persona. For instance, Prem says he was intrigued by the look on her face in the Ennai Arindhaal hit number ‘Mazhai Vara Pogudhe’ as Hemanika walks down the stairs towards Ajith’s Satyadev.
Directors who have worked with Trisha over the years agree on one thing – her ability to be a team player. “She can be painfully disciplined. After 17 years in the industry, she is still always on time; the rest of the team has to keep pace,” says Prem.
Defying the trend
96, everyone believed, would be the film that showcases Trisha the performer, and it did not disappoint. Industry trackers say this is long overdue because she has been working in films across languages without a break. And, while we celebrate other actresses, credit must be given to Trisha for staying relevant at a time when heroines have a very limited time gap to make a name for themselves. Trisha herself does not really like being termed a “survivor” (In an earlier interview, she said she tends to look at it as a back-handed compliment). And, no, she has not ‘preserved’ herself well too — she’s not a pickle!
Director Dharani, who worked with her in the superhit Ghilli with Vijay, one of her earliest successes, still fondly recalls an innocent Trisha who was a willing student. “It was a film that revolved around her, and she was still a newcomer. Despite that, her reactions were just what I wanted. Many questioned my casting her as this young girl, considering she was fresh from the success of Saamy, where she played a married woman. But, I was convinced that the freshness of her face would draw people to her character, and that’s what happened.”
While she was working on the film, the infamous CD controversy broke. Says Dharani: “That one incident showed me what strength of mind she possessed. She was in the initial stages of her career and there was a lot at stake, but she dealt with it in a very mature manner. I felt others could learn to be brave from her. She always saw the big picture; she was meant to last the course.”
An inspiring career
One of those who has worked with Trisha in the initial stages and later when she became a star is actor Siddharth; they were paired in Mani Ratnam’s Aaytha Ezhuthu, Prabhudheva’s Telugu superhit Nuvvostanante Nenoddantana, and Sundar C’s Aranmanai 2. “She’s always been this very young person to interact with on the sets. We worked back-to-back with Mani Sir and Prabhudheva; she was fresh from the success of Varsham with Prabhas and I was looking for a hit. She submits to a director, totally. To think that she shot simultaneously for these two films that cast her very differently! I have great respect that she’s still working in the kind of projects she is. Female actors have a lot stacked against them. To beat the odds and be active this long is deeply inspirational.”
Another co-star says what works in Trisha’s favour is that she’s bonafide heroine material. “She’s stunning on screen, dances like a dream and people still relate to her; they think the girl on screen is real. But, you have to concede that she is part of a thankless business where performers are dependent on someone to give them work.”
Frank talk
That Trisha has achieved this despite her propensity for frank talk is intriguing. In an industry known for platitudes and political correctness, she’s that rare actor who wears her heart on her sleeve, unapologetic about who she is and what her choices are. In an interview to reviewer and trade analyst Sreedhar Pillai, she spoke openly about an ‘issue’ with Nayanthara, and how they did not speak for some time, till the ice was broken. Nayanthara referred to this in an interview with Divyadarshini, and recalled how Trisha was the one who was magnanimous enough to come up to her, speak and sort out a non-issue. This ability of Trisha to not hold on to grudges is something others speak of too.
In January 2015, she announced her engagement to Varun Manian, and called it off some months later. Rumour mills churned incessantly, but she chose to maintain a dignified silence. The actress also told Pillai that some years ago, she did not take very well to the sudden rush of newcomers, and wondered if others could be ‘number one’ when she was around. Then, she realised that space could be shared and that she had the option of moving to a different level and trying different things. Kodi’s Rudhra and 96’s Jaanu, whose face lights up at the mere mention of a fond classmate, are part of that career shift.
The many shades of love
To her credit, Trisha has looked the same over the years. She can still play a young girl fresh in love, but her face also has the maturity that allowed her to play the flawed Rudhra. She’s done very well in roles that allow her to underplay. Like Vinnaithaandi Varuvaaya’s Jessie. Even Trisha has said she thought it was a simple love story, but the screenplay by Gautham Vasudev Menon that dipped into the insecurities and confusions of youth touched a chord across cities. 96 saw her in a similar space – less make-up, and lots of love to go around. Traditionally, that’s a genre the actress has excelled in.
Those in the industry who have seen her career graph in Tamil and Telugu, where she has clocked numerous hits, say the fact that her mother Uma is also her manager is a double-edged sword. “Her presence ensures a certain safety net for Trisha, but it also means she does not have access to a professional opinion when someone comes to her with a script. That explains the poor choices of late. An actor might be brilliant, and things will fall in place when she’s at her peak, but it is when the career plateaus that you need professional help to get you back where you belong. Trisha lacks that. She had no business doing a film like Mohini,” says an associate. But Trisha depends on her mother for everything behind-the-scene. “We are a good team,” she has insisted, across platforms.
Another reason being attributed to her recent tepid run is that she does not choose scripts after thought. “Most seem to be based on gut instinct; it might not work always,” says a publicist.
Speaking up
Among the current crop of actors, Trisha is among the few who speak Tamizh but really does not dub for herself in every film. For long, Savitha Reddy has been her voice, and even won the Tamil Nadu State Film Award for Best Female Dubbing Artist for Something Something …Unakkum Enakkum. Chinmayi has dubbed for Trisha for her seminal role of Jessie and for 96. The audience has heard Trisha’s real voice in a handful of movies – Aaydha Ezhuthu, Manmadhan Ambu, Samar, Mankatha and Thoongavanam. The actress has said it was Kamal Haasan, her co-star in Manmadhan Ambu and Thoongavanam who encouraged her to speak her own lines.
The general perception is that Trisha excels in roles that are soft, yet with a spine of steel. Should Trisha fight that perception and attempt things that are way out of her comfort zone? Not many think so. “It’s rare for someone to have that kind of softness after all these years in the industry. She should not fight it, but use it to her advantage,” says a co-star. Hey Jude in Malayalam is another example of Trisha trying to work differently but from within the system. Her turn as Crystal, who has bipolar disorder, was delicate and vulnerable with rough edges.
Free spirit
Should she take up yet another Hemanika? A dancer who pursues a path of her making is a mom to a child and someone who loves a man deeply enough to initiate their first hug. A girl who is rooted but also a free bird? That would be nice because what ultimately draws people and creators to Trisha seems to be her free spirit. “She’s a happy person drawn to good stories. And, that kind of happiness is contagious,” says Prem, who also best explains why Trisha has that effect on people. “She’s an open book. There’s no malice in her, and the camera catches that honesty. She does not act, rather she behaves between action and cut. She trusts directors, and so you are duty-bound to do better. After all, it’s not possible to sustain for so long merely on one’s looks!”
The actress has a couple of projects in hand that should hopefully place her in an orbit where she chooses to be. Till those kinds of roles are being written, there will always be a space for an actress who has openly admitted to learning on the job, and who confesses she knows nothing else but cinema.
It helps that Trisha has an active social life beyond cinema. She’s known for her love for pets and her work with abandoned creatures and takes off on holidays with friends outside of the industry. She stays clear of controversies and restricts her work in cinema to shoots and promotions. The truth is that the Tamil audience has never known how to read her. She’s unlike any actress they’ve seen. She lives life on her own terms and they seem to have finally understood what she’s always known. That birds are happiest in flight.
International Film Festival Of India (IFFI), the Central government-backed annual event held in Panaji, is gearing up to celebrate its golden jubilee this year. The festival, which will be held from November 20 till 28, will screen close to 250 films from different countries. This year, Russia is the festival’s partner country.
One of the highlights of the festival is a retrospective of Golden Peacock Award-winning films of the past 49 years. The section will showcase 8 films from 8 different countries, opening with Gamperaliya directed by Lester James Peries, the first Golden Peacock Award winner of 1965. Other films to be screened in this section are At Five in the Afternoon directed by Samira Makhmalbaf, Moner Manush directed by Goutam Ghose, Porfirio directed by Alejandro Landes, The Bostonians directed by James Ivory, The King of Masks by directed Tian Ming Wu, Tulpan directed by Sergei Dvortsevov and Leviathan directed by Andrey Zvyaginstev.
This year, John Bailey, cinematographer and former President of the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences will chair the International Jury. French filmmaker Robin Campillo, who served as a member of the Cannes International Jury 2019, Chinese filmmaker Zhang Yang and British filmmaker Lynne Ramsay, will be the co-jurors. Filmmaker Ramesh Sippy is the Indian member of the International Jury. The International Competition of the festival consists of 15 movies out of which 2 of them are Indian – Mai Ghat: Crime No. 103/2005, directed by Anand Mahadevan, and Jallikattu directed by Lijo Jose Pellissery. In this competition section, films have been produced and co-produced by 22 countries.
In the debut films’ competition section of the festival, there are two Indian films – Gujarati film, Hellaro, directed by Abhishek Shah, which won a national award for the best feature film this year, and Malayalam film Uyare, directed by Manu Ashokan.
This year, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has also launched a ‘caravan’ of movies that will travel across cities like Hyderabad, Chennai, Bangalore, Mumbai, Kolkata, Guwahati and Thiruvananthapuram, and screen films. Other sideline events of the festival includes masterclasses by eminent film personalities from India and abroad, talk sessions, open air screenings, and the Film Bazaar which is organised by NFDC
“I’ve been working in films for about 27 years, and halfway through I realised that I’m not half as talented as I think I am. So 3.5 billion people have to love me because if it was just for talent or skill, no, they wouldn’t have loved me,” says Shah Rukh Khan in the first few minutes of My Next Guest With David Letterman and Shah Rukh Khan, on Netflix.
In an intelligent marketing move, the show was released online on October 25, 2019, which also happens to be the 28th wedding anniversary of Shah Rukh Khan and his wife Gauri.
When you’re interviewing the most well-articulated man in the Hindi film industry, you don’t have to worry about the story-boarding of a world-famous show. In this case, they didn’t.
My Next Guest with David Letterman and Shah Rukh Khan is a summary of the actor’s life, told by David through his lens. David seems to be stupefied by the maddening fandom for the actor around the country and abroad. While opening the show, he says, “This is just beyond anything we ever imagined.”
A hand-painted wall poster of Shahjahan and Mumtaz from the 1963 film Taj Mahal opens the show. The next 20 seconds are a cliche montage of quintessential Mumbai — the local trains, Churchgate station and the Bandstand Promenade in Bandra with thousands of people waiting to catch a glimpse of the King of Bollywood, outside his house — Mannat. The editors didn’t take too long to build up into the show and cut straight away with Letterman shaking hands with SRK’s six-year-old son AbRam who ruled the (paparazzi) roost before Taimur Ali Khan was born.
Letterman runs into someone on the street, an NRI living in New Jersey. After a brief conversation with him, the host decides to buy him a framed image of a Hindu god signing it for him as a present to his aging mother who lives in India. What was the need to have this clip in a show about SRK? To show that an average Indian, in this case, an NRI, knows who David Letterman is? There are glimpses of dancers (who look straight out of a movie made for the west in costumes cut from the same yarn) dancing to the tunes of a sitar. We could have done without them.
The background music reminds one of the ‘travel and living’ shows we’ve all watched, you know the ones where foreign hosts visit roadside eateries, slums, and shop on the streets being amazed by the elephant god and glittery outfits? Here, David also visits a flower market and ends up offering a rose from another flower shop to a woman… who is a florist. She doesn’t look amazed at all, yet the camera stays on her for a few seconds to capture her blank expression.
After some fragrant frames, they take us straight into the actor’s kitchen. We learn two major things. One, SRK makes food at 2 or 3 am in the morning to help his kids beat midnight hunger pangs and uses this opportunity to spend time with them, without invading their privacy. Two, the intercom extension number for SRK’s kitchen is 9. Fans can just make peace with this because this is the closest they’ll come to knowing any contact number related to the man.
Shah Rukh chopping garlic and making pesto sauce in his food processor while dusting chicken fillets with cornflour is a sight to devour. You get to see his wife Gauri sitting across the table, having food and talking about life and the kids for the first time on popular television. David manages to talk to the eccentric couple about more than what Karan Johar has been able to in all these seasons of Koffee With Karan.
You hear the same stories — about how he came to Bombay with 400 rupees to find Gauri on a beach because she liked to swim. Their love story, their C – gang from Delhi and more trivia. It’s possibly 100th time one’s listening to these tales, but they still seem like a fairy tale coming from the horse’s mouth. Here’s where you fall for the charm and chivalry of Shah Rukh Khan, the man who reiterates how women should be treated right.
There are some emotionally moving moments in the show, in one of which, David very innocently and purely in the capacity of an interviewer says, “Both your parents died.” As they discuss the adversities of SRK losing his parents at a very young age, SRK mentions, “You know we were not very well to do. So to go to a movie theatre was a very big thing.” While the air in the room becomes grim, SRK quickly manages to bring the laughter back by saying that his father had a crush on a lady called Madhubala who was extremely beautiful. “He didn’t become anything. I call him the most successful failure in the world,” Shah Rukh talks about his father.
The entertainment quotient in this episode of course comes from the exceptionally cathartic and witty storytelling of, but the actual pleasure is in questions that Dave asks him in between intervals. He asks, “Is it like this wherever you go? And the reaction to almost every breath you take.” A very modest SRK smiles, his dimples lighting up the screen. That’s all.
The narrative does not glorify the man we’ve come to call King Khan. It probably aims to, but it doesn’t need to. Shah Rukh’s self-awareness and being the most articulate man in the film business make him just the right man to represent the country on a global platform, on a world-famous show.
When SRK talks about how his mother gave him to his grandmother for five years, David couldn’t help but ask if it’s a common practice in India. (It was because his grandmother had four daughters and wanted to raise a son.) Even in 2019 the west’s perception of what constitutes an individual’s story and what makes up ‘Indian culture’ is myopic.
“There’ll be 90 girls in a play and we need 10 boys. That kind of encouraged me to become an actor. I used to work on something called Ramleela, where the depiction of Ramayan is done you know, block-wise, or city-wise. So Hanumanji would say, bol siyaapati ram chandra ki…,” SRK said and the audience in a chorus replied, “Jai!!!” It’s a remarkable commentary on our pluralism, without saying as much.
“My son doesn’t want to act. I don’t think he can. But I don’t think he has what it takes perhaps, and he realised it himself. But he’s a good writer. His issue was, which I think is very very practical and honest, he said, ‘Every time I’ll be compared to you. So if I do well, it will not be because I got skilled at this. It’ll be Oh, obviously, he’s his son, so he will do well. It’s in the genes,” he says.
The last question from Letterman was the winner. “I’m gonna ask you a question and answer it, don’t answer it, I get paid either way. How does your country collectively feel with regard to the president of our country?”
Shah Rukh Khan, while he knows he might steer controversy as he speaks about Donald Trump, the President of the United States of America, says, “Maybe you guys deserve it.”
We’re not sure if Trump cares about his answer, but this show, after all, is what all SRK fans deserved to watch.
So you finally settle down on your soft bed, with your softer littlest one & say, “let’s watch something new today…on @NetflixIndia …” and this banner pops up!! & the littlest one quips…”papa it’s not new…it’s just you!! “ Well… pic.twitter.com/ncu2RA74h6
The teaser of Udhayanidhi Stalin and Nithya Menen starrer Psycho is out now and has garnered over a million views. The Mysskin directorial is bankrolled by Arun Mozhi Manickam under his Double Meaning Productions banner.
The teaser features Udhayanidhi (who has a visual impairment), an anxious Nithya Menen and a watchful Aditi Rao Hydari. Quick intriguing shots of a naked man, some blood, butcher knives, slaughtered humans and a strange man running, make up the teaser. The trademark Mysskin cut manages to pique one’s interest with the background music (especially done by Mysskin) adding value to the thrills and spills.
Director Mani Ratnam launched the teaser, which later dropped on Youtube.
“All credit goes to director Mysskin sir, who was very confident with what was presented as a teaser. We are really happy with the way people have responded. Audiences are always ready to accept films with unique and exceptional content at all times and the overnight success of Psycho teaser stands out to be evidence for this,” said producer Arun Mozhi Manickam.
The audio rights of the movie were bagged recently by Sony Music South.
“I firmly believe that the brilliant music of Ilayaraja sir will create extraordinary milestones,” said Arun Mozhi.
Psycho is touted to be a psychological thriller. The film is reportedly based on the tale of Angulimala (finger necklace) which is a central story in Buddhism. According to Buddhist literature, Angulimala was a coldblooded bandit who murdered people and made a necklace of their fingers until his meeting with the Buddha, at which point he followed the Buddha to a monastery and embraced monkhood. Udhayanidhi Stalin plays Gautham (which is Buddha’s name) who reportedly imparts knowledge to the serial killer. PC Sreeram has handled camera Isaignani Ilayaraja has composed music and Anthony has taken up editing responsibilities.
Cast: Rajkummar Rao, Boman Irani, Paresh Rawal, Mouni Roy
Director: Mikhil Musale
In one unexpected scene in Made in China, Rukmani (Mouni Roy) asks Raghu (Rajkummar Rao) to shut the door, just when you think it is for the couple to fight without their child noticing, he helps her light up a cigarette and the two share it. She’s sitting inside a bathtub and washing clothes. He asks her to move and washes while she looks away into the distance puffing wistfully. I kept thinking about what would a Vidya Balan have done in that scene. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not a “pathbreaking” role like an ISRO scientist or anything. But it’s a really well-written housewife’s role. Those are so rare. And Mouni Roy woefully underwhelms.
Elsewhere the film suffers from the exact opposite problem. It assembles a stellar cast of performers and undersells and badly stages their scenes. I wasn’t sure what to make of Raghu through the film. Not in a good way. Boman Irani appears as Dr. Vardhi in a niche he’s created for himself, the old professor uncle saying whatever the hell he wants. He, like the other famous Gujarati, Gandhi, has a pet goat.
Raghu calls himself a serial entrepreneur (no else will), and fails in every small business attempt when he lands up in China thanks to an annoying cousin Devraj (Sumeet Vyas). It is here that Paresh Rawal’s Tanmay Shaw, a successful businessman, overcome by love for a fellow Gujju for sharing his theplas with him, gives him gyan, among other things: Customer chutiya (this is beeped out every time) hai. Then one thing leads to another and Raghu is soon setting up an underground business, just like the alcohol business in the dry state. Selling a ‘magic soup’ that promises to be better than viagra. Though the film is about his rise and rise, when it begins, he’s actually wanted by the CBI. A Chinese General dies right after consuming the soup. So they suspect he’s adding tiger penis to the soup. (Umm).
Rajkummar Rao tries to get into the skin of Raghu but struggles because the foundation of this role is so weak. He is at his best when he is playing up the hypocrisy of his role. The man who prays to the cow’s udder in his home eats eggs when he drinks in China. The scenes with ‘Julie Ben’ his Chinese friend are sweet. Here too Rajkummar is entirely a home. Gajraj Rao as the inspiration guru is fun briefly. A lot of the good elements in the film are the result of good writing, but most of them never translate to good cinematic moments, unfortunately.
The film is long and slow (not in a good way). It takes many detours and is hell-bent on being a ‘message’ movie about the hypocrisy around sex education in India. It lacks the gumption to just be a movie about a man who doesn’t care what people think, and becomes big selling ‘Tiger – Magic Soup’ in the underground market. And it doesn’t have the depth to send a subtle message home. It hammers the message out loud, with not one, not two but three long drawn scenes in which Raghu and Dr Vardhi, give gyan about why we must all talk about sex openly.
So far as this movie business is concerned, perhaps the customer is not such a *beep*? To wrap this up with a cliche, the makers of this film, in the words of Tanmay Shah, do not have the key to the lock in our hearts.
The Made in China review is a Silverscreen original article. It was not paid for or commissioned by anyone associated with the film. Silverscreen.in and its writers do not have any commercial relationship with movies that are reviewed on the site.
Director Lokesh Kanagaraj is elated with the response for his Karthi starrer Kaithi that hit screens yesterday. The action-drama had concluded with a cliffhanger about its second installment and will now be followed by a sequel very soon.
Lokesh took to Twitter to announce the news.
Thanx for the overwhelming response guys,.. loved every minute in sets and the entire process of making kaithi…will cherish this forever! Thank you once again prabu sir and karthi sir for the opportunity!..To answer all your txts and calls yes“ Dilli will be back”👍 pic.twitter.com/uZ6lWX24x3
The team held a success press meet today where Karthi thanked the press for the appreciation pouring in. He told the gathering that director Lokesh Kanagaraj had asked him for a period of thirty days to complete the second part.
A source privy to the developments told Silverscreen that the sequel will revolve around the flashback that Karthi narrates in the film, the script book of which was completed once Kaithi was wrapped up. The director will reportedly work on it after he completes ‘Thalapathy 64’, according to the source.
Kaithi helmed by Lokesh Kanagaraj is bankrolled by Dream Warrior Pictures’ SR Prabhu. The film also stars Narain, Vijay TV fame Dheena, Ramana, Baby Monica, Arjun Das, and Mariam George. Sathyan Sooryan has cranked camera, Philomin Raj has taken care of editing, Sam CS has composed music with Anbariv choreographing action sequences.
A group of indie filmmakers has launched a social media campaign against the International Film Festival Of Kerala (IFFK), alleging that the festival’s film selection committee has been flouting rules and rejecting films without viewing them. On Facebook page, Reform The IFFK, the filmmakers say that they were going to file a legal petition against the film festival to get the current selection lists of Indian and Malayalam films cancelled. They demand that the Academy to reconstitute the panels and make fresh and fair selections. The filmmakers also allege that the Chalachitra Academy was favouring commercial films over independent arthouse films.
The 24th edition of IFFK, organised by Kerala Chalachitra Academy, is scheduled to take place from December 6 to 12. Two Malayalam movies – Vruthakrithiyilulla Chathuram directed by Krushanth RK, and Jallikattudirected by Lijo Jose Pellissery – have been selected for the competition section. Jallikattu, which premiered at Toronto International Film Festival in September, released in theatres in Kerala on October 4. Among the 12 films selected in the Malayalam Cinema Today category, six are commercially successful mainstream films – Ishq- Not a Love Story (directed by Anuraj Manohar), Kumbalangi Nights (directed by Madhu C Narayanan), Virus (Ashiq Abu), Uyare (Manu Ashokan), And The Oscar Goes To (Saleem Ahmed), and Unda (Khalid Rahman).
Last year, of the 14 films selected in Malayalam Cinema Today section of IFFK, six were films that had a theatrical release.
On Friday, filmmaker Leena Manimekalai, whose Maadathy — an Unfairy Tale had its world premiere at Busan International Film Festival recently and was also in the international competition section of Kolkata International Film Festival scheduled to happen in the second week of November, said on Facebook that her film was not viewed by the IFFK committee. “It is sad that IFFK, the festival that played a crucial role in me becoming a filmmaker, the festival where I have been on preselection jury myself is becoming a playground for politics, corruption, and nepotism by the few and the powerful,” she said on Facebook.
First, the Housefull franchise is tainted by the involvement of Sajid Khan, one of the Bollywood names accused in the Me-Too movement last year. He has directed the first two films and was signed on to direct the latest, the fourth one. He was later, in a sincere effort, replaced by Farhad Samji. Me Too or no Me Too, the Housefull films are hard not to dislike. They are funny only because the makers tell us they are supposed to be. They often turn out to be the biggest jokes. Well, I’ll admit. We are part of the joke too. These films have been huge box office successes. So the makers are laughing all the way to the bank and the joke is, also in part, on us.
Housefull 4 is particularly poor. It is further tainted by a lack of originality. The bare bones of the plot are straight out of SS Rajamouli’s Maghadheera. Harry (Akshay Kumar), Roy (Riteish Deshmukh) and Max (Bobby Deol) are Londoners who owe Big Bhai (Manoj Pahwa) — hint Big Ben, get it? — some money. How they lost that money is a Jenga tower of unfunny sequences painfully stacked over each other. But Harry also sees visions of a past set six hundred years ago in the kingdom of Sitamgarh.
To get the money owed to Big Bhai, they try to get married into another rich desi London family. The women are Kriti (Kriti Sanon), Pooja (Pooja Hegde) and Neha (Kriti Kharbanda). They couldn’t get Neha Sharma to play another Neha, I guess. Lucky Kriti Kharbanda. The women have their medieval counterparts too — Madhu, Mala, and Meena. Every character has got its counterparts. Post-Baahubali, Bollywood wants a piece of everything Rajamouli has ever done. But Housefull 4 doesn’t even take comedy seriously. They’ve been led to believe (and I am afraid, rightly so) that we’ll laugh at just about anything — birds shitting on characters’ heads, homophobic and transphobic jokes, jokes followed by funny background music, tribal kingdoms depicted as black-faced savages and cannibals.
The end credits, in Jackie Chan film fashion, show a blooper reel, every bit funnier than all the so-called jokes in the film put together. The credits also have the biggest joke. This cinematic excretion credits four people for the screenplay.
The Housefull 4 review is a Silverscreen original article. It was not paid for or commissioned by anyone associated with the film. Silverscreen.in and its writers do not have any commercial relationship with movies that are reviewed on the site.